Tampa Divorce Attorney Tampa Divorce Lawyer Firm Overview Attorney Profiles Recent News Newsletters Frequently Asked Questions Contact Our Firm
(800) 716-6206
Family Law Practice Areas
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
You are in:
Tampa Family Law
Introduction
Divorce
Mediation
Flat Fee Divorce
Military Divorce
Alimony
Child Custody
Child Support
Modification of Alimony
Modification of Child Custody
Modification of Child Support
Collaborative Divorce
Contempt of Court
Domestic Violence
Durational Alimony
Enforcement of Court Orders
Enforcement of Settlement Agreements
Grandparents' Rights
Need a Second Opinion?
Permanent Alimony
Property Division
Property Rights
Recovery of Attorney's Fees
Rehabilitative Alimony
Relocation of Children
Transitional Alimony
Visitation
Support Services
Helpful Articles
Florida Family Law Videos

Passive Appreciation of Nonmarital Property

Many clients purchase a home before they get married and are curious about whether their spouse is entitled to any of the equity in that home during a divorce. The answer, as it very often is, depends on numerous circumstances. The Florida Supreme Court recently addressed this issue in a case entitled Kaaa v. Kaaa.

The Husband in Kaaa bought a home six months before the parties were married. The parties were married for 27 years before filing for divorce. During the marriage, they enhanced the value of the home by paying down $22,279 on the mortgage and renovating the carport increasing the value of the home by $14,400. The trial court held that the parties active contributions to enhancing the value of the home was marital property and subject to equitable distribution. The Wife argued that the passive appreciation of the marital home was marital property as well.

Passive appreciation refers to the natural market forces that appreciate (or depreciate) the value of the home over time. The Florida Supreme Court held that the passive appreciation of the marital home was indeed marital property subject to equitable distribution when 1) the value of the home appreciated during the marriage while marital funds were being used to pay the mortgage and 2) the Wife made contributions to the home. The Court reasoned that because paying the mortgage is a prerequisite to enjoying the appreciation in value of a marital home, they concluded that principles of equity do not allow an owner spouse to receive the full benefit of the passive appreciation when the nonowner spouse contributed to the property, and marital funds were used to pay the mortgage.

The Florida Supreme Court went on to set forth the ways a trial court should determine an award of passive appreciation. If you think you might have contributed to a nonmarital property and should be awarded an equitable interest in the passive appreciation of your home, contact your expert family law attorney to discuss this issue and whether it might apply to your dissolution of marriage case.

Family Law & Divorce Videos
Instant Callback from an Attorney
Florida Family Law Blog
Follow our Social Networking Pages
Tampa Divorce Attorney
Board Certified by the Florida Bar in Marital & Family Law Best Lawyers in America Super Lawyers AV Rated for Ethical Standards and Legal Ability
Givens Divorce Law Group Divorce Videos from Attorney Stann Givens Click to Call our Law Firm Florida Family Law Blog
Florida Family & Divorce Law Information Center Florida Family Law Attorney
Tampa Divorce Lawyer Uncontested Divorce Lawyer Tampa Child Custody Attorney Tampa Alimony Attorney Tampa Domestic Violence Lawyer
800-716-6206